| |
|
Q&A:
Baldrige and Studer Group’s Nine Principles®:
Prescriptive Answers to Non-Prescriptive Criteria
Hardwired Results® interviews
Studer Group coach Lucy Crouch…
HR:
As a long-time Studer Group coach and past Baldrige National Examiner,
can you share your observations about where both processes align and where
they differ?
LC:
Any organization that has been applying Studer Group's Must-Haves
SM1 and Nine Principles®2 for 18 to 24 months will
find that the Baldrige Criteria is less about doing new things and more
about describing Studer Group tools that have already been implemented.
For example, Category 5 Criteria asks how an organization recruits, hires
and retains new staff. An organization using our prescriptive to do's
would answer by describing the peer interview process, the 30 and 90 day
questions and how the Standards of Performance are used in the selection
process.
However, when an organization begins to apply the Baldrige Criteria they
will find some gaps that Studer Group processes and tools do not fully
address. For example, Baldrige includes Criteria on governance (Category
1); safety and disaster preparedness (Category 5); and market analysis
(Category 3) that are not a focus of Studer Group coaching. While Studer
Group's Five Pillar framework3 and 90-day plans offer a foundation
for how organizations will achieve short-and long-term goals with respect
to strategic planning, it is not as comprehensive an approach as the Criteria
require.
HR:
Are there lessons health care can learn from other industries
that have won the Baldrige?
LC:
Countless lessons. The Baldrige Categories are the same for all industries.
Anyone applying has to address a focus on staff, leadership, strategic
planning, and focus on the customer, etc. We're just not that different
in health care from other businesses. What works well in leadership (Category
1), strategic planning (Category 2), or for employees (Category 5) is
not necessarily industry specific. If an organization believes it can
only learn from a similar health care organization, they have immediately
lost a great deal of opportunity in learning from the best.
HR:
Any insights for Studer Group partner organizations that are considering
Baldrige?
LC:
I find that high-performing organizations are at a risk for "declaring
victory". Once you declare victory, you lose momentum. This is an
idea first put forth by John Kotter in his article "Leading Change:
Why Transformation Efforts Fail.4 He postulates that it can
take five to ten years for changes to sink deeply into a company's culture—we'd
call it "hardwiring”"—and that during this time
new approaches are fragile and subject to regression. And while celebrating
wins is key to generating the energy required to get to the next level,
declaring victory is fatal.
I always encourage successful organizations I coach to apply for Baldrige.
When an organization starts using the Baldrige Criteria, pockets of opportunity
become quickly evident. If you're on a journey to excellence, it's a journey
that never ends. The Criteria force the organization to always ask, "What
can we do better?" So while there is no "victory", the
journey hardwires aculture of continuous quality improvement.
|
|
|
| |
|

Click
here for larger graph

1
Studer Group's six Must-HavesSM for service and operational
excellence include Rounding for Outcomes, Employee Thank You Notes, Selection
and the First 90 Days, Discharge Phone Calls, Key Words at Key Times,
and Aligning Leader Evaluations with Desired Behaviors. For more information,
visit www.studergroup.com and search on "Must Haves."
2
Studer Group's Nine Principles® provide organizations with a sequenced
step-by-step process to attain desired results. For details, visit studergroup.com
and search on "Nine Principles®."
3 Studer Group's Five Pillars include
People, Service, Quality, Finance, and Growth. For more information, visit
www.studergroup.com and search on "Pillars."
|